Visualizing Geography: Atlas for the Blind (1837)

•May 31, 2012 • Leave a Comment

A friend passed along this gem of cartographic history to me today and I must share. This comes via the David Rumsey Historical Map Collection, who have 1 of the 5 remaining original maps designed by the New England Institute for the Education of the Blind in Boston in 1837. The map is apparently the first map produced for the blind that they could read without the assistance of a seeing person. While the map is not ‘written’ in contemporary Braille, it is embossed with the relative geographic outlines of topographic features, such as lakes and mountains, as well as the relative interpretive information a reader would need in order to ‘visualize’ the geography being described to them through their fingers. The accompanying keys/legends and narrative descriptions of each state/geographic visualization enabled, in theory, blind students to encounter maps much like we do now: Through a set of interpretive coded and visualizing mechanisms that enable one to visualize the larger scale of land and national boundaries.

What is striking to me is how similar this experience for the ‘blind’ is to the experience of the ‘seeing.’ Neither group can ever see the geographies mapped into atlases, but we rely on some play of scale and imagination to enable us to see things much larger than our corporeal scope of vision. This makes me think of the relationship between seeing and blindness in terms of what they have in common: A shared effort to push upon the limits of vision each is endowed with. I wonder if this is a better way of interpreting blindness not as a lack of vision, or a sense displaced onto other senses likes hearing and olfactory to ‘make-up’ for its absence, but a state of imagining or learning: As developing a capacity to understand or inhabit something more. A desire, in other words, not so much an impediment.

Learning to see, in this regard, seems to be a relatively shared concept among the visually ‘paired’ or impaired. As one of the map’s creators explains:

“[the blind children] soon understood that sheets of stiff pasteboard, marked by certain crooked lines, represented the boundaries of countries; rough raised dots represented mountains; pin heads sticking out here and there, showed the locations of towns; or, on a smaller scale, the boundaries of their own town, the location of the meeting-house, of their own and of the neighboring houses, and the like; and they were delighted and eager to go on with tireless curiosity.”

Do we not also approach the foreignness of the world like this? Through representations, interpretations, putting things into place? Making our geographies? Seems like an all too human process.

Images can all be found at: http://www.davidrumsey.com/

“Things Change”: Jo Peel

•May 3, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Came across this via The Atlantic Cities. Jo Peel, a urban visual artist from London, does a time lapse of her city mural, “Things Change.” After an amazing panel discussion at the Protest and Public Space Conference at the CUNY Grad Center, this video seemed to capture, visually, the questions I keep coming back to about the porous space between streets, walls, bodies, and imagination.

How do cities come into being, layer by layer, person by person, moment to moment, pixel by pixel? When we break the built environment down, speed it up, watch it grow and crumble…When we ask more from it, what do we mean? What does it want from us? And to what extent are the answers to these questions framed by how we look at and imagine our cities? A few of my jumbled thoughts while I bask in the Benjaminian aura of watching this city grow…

Zimmerman Supporters: “I Killed Trayvon Martin”

•April 30, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Image

Across the nation supporters have rallied in defense of alleged shooter of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman. “I call out to people to be awake. Open your mind and your senses to the impending assault on our civil liberties” spoke Charles Gulman. Gulman, a Fish and Game store owner, is one of hundreds rallied at charity firearm swap Grieved Guns for George. “We are gonna be out here every week until we raise enough money, or enough guns to defend our right to defend ourselves.”

Besides the broker fees for arranging swaps, money is also being raised by vending political action merchandise. Over half the attendees are sporting shirts and buttons emblazoned with red, white, and blue flames surrounding the statement: “I killed Trayvon Martin.”

“It’s a relief to see so many people still care about what direction we are headed in,” said Cynthia Thayer, organizer for the event. “When Georgie was arrested we knew something had to be done,” she said, while answering questions about the impetus of this new counter movement. “So we talked to the county commissioner so that we were licensed and legal. And we had a cook out.”

Advertising for the expanding movement took off through a counter to the ubiquitous phrase “I am Trayvon Martin” which everyone from Occupiers to professional sports teams has been wearing. The statement “I killed Trayvon Martin” is featured on headbands, hats, tank tops, and buttons. Online sales were immediately viral, with much support coming from orders across the country.

Supporters for George Zimmerman have raised over $200,000 in funds since he was arrested and charged with second degree murder three weeks ago.

-written by guest correspondent Tyler Foley

Places Been: Sketches

•April 21, 2012 • Leave a Comment

 

Las Torres, Santiago de Chile

Severe Weather, Oklahoma

The Great Escape, Rio de Janeiro

Charcoal drawings on paper from travels between 2009-2012 by Em.

“I Cried Real Tears” : Why America Loves The Hunger Games

•March 27, 2012 • Leave a Comment

I took a leap of faith when I read The Hunger Games and said that most people who read the series understood that it reflected some shadowy depiction of reality. Yes, this is a big leap of faith, since those fearlessly rascist Twitter posts have reminded me that there are just many ignorant and illiterate fans of the books as there are compassionate and intelligent readers. But let’s say that even those fans who needed Rue to be an “innocent little blonde girl” before they could get emotionally invested recognized that outside their head, in the real world, children are killing and dying every day.

We do not have the luxury of total geographic and cultural isolation that the citizens of Panem’s capitol had, which means that even those of us with snooty voices and ironic tattoos have at least heard of the Lords Resistance Army, Trayvon Martin, or “gang wars” in cities like Los Angeles, Oakland, and Newark. Those of us who bother to pay more attention have summary knowledge of police brutality and debilitating poverty throughout the US, political conflicts in Libya, Columbia, Syria, and Sudan… murders of Aboriginal children in Australia and Canada…mass starvation in south Asia…live televised hunger games in Haiti and drug related (CIA sponsored) child warfare in Mexico and throughout Latin America. Not to mention those “natural” killers, like tracker-jackers and rabid dogs, that could be easily prevented – murderous illnesses like tuberculosis, malaria, and diarrhea. And that’s what we know about “injustice” while just being lazy and mildly attentive. I’m sure a half-hearted google search could triple this list. Some intelligent research would unearth more man-made tragedy than a person can be expected to comprehend.

So hey, why don’t we cry for those kids? When beautiful little Rue was lay dead in a bed of wildflowers (in the book and the film), I cried. “Real tears”, as my boyfriend’s mother put it so succinctly. When Trayvon Martin was shot in the chest and lay dead in the grass…I watched. I shrugged my shoulders. Definitely not because I did not care, but because I was not surprised. I said to myself, “he’s not the first, or the last.” Most of us, ashamed or not, behaved the same way.

This can be blamed on nothing so simple as human apathy. It is true that when we see news we do not like, we change the channel. Maybe we post a link to facebook first, to make other people read an article we didn’t bother to finish. Or maybe we even make a t-shirt, or a poster, or wear a hoodie, or spend the night in the park. Maybe we do all of these things and more. But what we do NOT allow ourselves to do, is feel too deeply. What we do not do, for Trayvon, or the 16-year-old boy on my block who was just shot by another 16-year old boy from the block, or every boy named Ahmed who will die in an explosion in the name of Allah or “freedom” or oil- for each one of those children we do not take 2-hours from our life to eat some popcorn and mourn.

The Hunger Games fits, though we hate to admit it, into the “escapism” of popular entertainment that allow to “feel human” for a few sweet hours without any lasting obligations or implications. One insightful writer to The Atlantic noted “In Katniss The Hunger Games offers that populist hero the Occupy movement wasn’t able to deliver.” I’m not saying stories like this shouldn’t exist, and I’m not saying that the educational value of these stories ought to be dismissed. All I’m saying is, I went to the movie and there was not a kid to be seen. A few young black men walked out about an hour into the movie, and I looked around to find myself in a dark room of teary-eyed women watching Katniss being dressed in flames. Again I say, be cautious:

“What innocent heroes don’t always understand is that they play a useful role for people who have much more cynical motives. The White Savior Industrial Complex is a valve for releasing the unbearable pressures that build in a system built on pillage.” (Teju Cole, The White Savior Industrial Complex )

Unlike the controversial (familiar) imagery of Kony 2012, The Hunger Games features no white man to come save the dark peoples of the earth. It’s no coincidence that in this fantasy world beautiful white people play the victims and suddenly it’s breaking records like ‘nobody’ saw coming. But one of the things Panem accomplishes so well is its feminist overtones and omni-racialism. It really condenses the “human problem”, and makes us believe we are all in this together. It allows us to feel, as deeply as we can muster for two/too short hours that in the days of the dark future, we will be on the right side. Not just the winning side. The Right side. The side for good people.

Different “optimists” may have their hopes in a different District 13 (Obama, Zuccotti Park, Iran, Israel) but we like to forget how the story ends. A leader emerges, bloodthirsty and power hungry as the rest, and tries to to institute their own world order. Think about it. Doesn’t this movie make you feel good about yourself, and think badly about everyone else? Be careful which evil you root for, or you may find yourself starving on the wrong side of the Great Divide.

State of The Union for Dummies

•February 1, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Last week President Obama gave his third annual State of the Union address. It’s probably the most important one of his career thus far, seeing as it comes nine short month before “Blah blah blah Bam USA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2012″!  If you hadn’t noticed. It’s also a pretty important speech for us, since it will help determine whether or not Obama can win over half a nation of idiots who might otherwise vote for Mitt Romney (gag), Newt Gingrich (yawn), or worse, Dick Santorum (shivers).

If you haven’t watched it yet, you can catch the complete “enhanced broadcast” HERE, complete with hilarious Colbert-esque graphics for people with short attention spans.

If you’re a die hard leftist, closet-socialist, or flaming anarchist you’ll find Obama’s pro-Amurrica, pushing numbers, economy talk to be a little GOP. I think he does a fine job of walking the thin middle line, a job no other candidate seems willing to do (or even capable of doing).

Here are some of my favorite highlights (for a variety of reasons) from the set.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

If you wanna grab some friends and catch up on the state of the nation together, there’s this daunting State of the Union 2012 DRINKING GAME  to keep things moving.

Domestic routes: Travels in familiar landscapes

•January 17, 2012 • Leave a Comment

There is no shortage of amazing places to visit, relax, and explore in our beautiful world. But ‘exotic’ travels are not necessarily geographically delimited by a national borders or legitimize by a stamp in a passport. While there is no ‘sticker’ for traversing state lines in the US, there is plenty of beauty and exoticism to be found in our own ‘backyards.’ Here is just the beginning of a few out-of-the-way and interesting places noteworthy of appeal in our domestic environs.

Hot Springs, Arkansas: Boyhood home of Bill Clinton, favorite southern hideaway of Al Capone

Deep in the endless hills of the Ozarks, is this hidden 1920s oasis of geothermal activity. Secret tunnels between hotels and bars distinguish the underground topography of this early 20th century gem of a town that doubled as a spa retreat and hideout for one of America’s most distinguished gangsters. Art deco hotels and bathouses line the main street of Hot Springs, AR, where Bill Clinton and the man Al Capone himself came for some R&R among the majestic healing waters bubbling out of the surface of the lush hills of central Arkansas. A city out of time, the architecture and mineral-rich landscape is well worth the detour on your southern routes. The mixture of old time saloons, restored (and neglected) 1920s art deco buildings and elaborately renovated bathouses (sadly out of commission), and heavy southern accents sweetly lull you into this domestic oasis. Find yourself some locals and get a taste of this folklore of times past.

 

Deep in the heart: Memphis, Tenessee

Along the banks of the muddy banks of the Missississippi, the blues well-up deep in the river, pouring down Beal Street into the sweet notes of a guitar dripping over the mummur of a hungry and lovesick crowd. Memphis is a magical and haunted place. Go down to the river and listen for her song.

 

Tomato pie! : Chicago, Illinois

Can’t say enough about the hometown. Wherever it is for you, hopefully you can indulge in all its good and bad whene you get your ramblin’ self back there. You may be surprised by what home has to offer. Sufficice it to say, if you find yourself in Chicago, get you some deep-dish pizza from Lou’s, Giordano’s, or Gino’s and you are good to go. The skyline is not to be missed (but is much better in the spring and fall than the dead of winter or heat of summer). Bring an appetite and your walking shoes.

Rolling green: Bowling Green, Kentucky

A little town between here and there that is quite a beautiful spot. Stop for a coffee or lunch and take in the verdent landscape and friendly lilt of the locals.

Missouri: Between here and there

Tornaodes tore through Joplin, MO last year, but ‘Missourah’ is still intact and quite a pleasant drive to make between destination 3 and 6. Sunsets are hard to beat en route west, and there is a Steak n’ Shake about every 10 miles.

 

Skycrapers on the prairie: Bartlesville, Oklahoma

Surprising but true, the only skyscraper designed by the prairie-house man himself, Frank Lloyd Wright, is the great state of Oklahoma. Perhaps not the first place one would think to find such architectural feats, yet this is quite the treat after a long drive west. Nested among the northeast territory of the Sooner state, the Price Tower is a great little spot to check into along your journey.

 

The only: New York, New York

As Dorothy says, clicking her red heels together, ‘there is no place like home.’ And we’re glad to call home New York City. Snow in October, Hurricanes in August, protests in Union Square, or dancing in Brooklyn. Some of the best places to be are right there in your face.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.